Leaving and Entering Religion:Understanding Religious Conversion in the Discourse of Religious Freedom and Human Right
Abstract
Religious conversion is a problematic phenomenon. It is supported based on religious freedom, but opposed based on religious doctrines and truth claims. The debate on religious conversion in relation to freedom of religion or belief (FoRB) tends to stop on the dichotomy of universalism and relativism of human rights. That is, religious conversion is recognized as a universal value, but in a particular context became relative. In this perspective, the implementation of religious conversion, which should be universal, becomes limited. As a result, there are various kinds of stigmatization against the subjects of religious conversion, for instance, they are labeled as "heretics", "infidels", "apostates", and even "dissidents" against religion. Therefore, to explain religious conversion in relation to religious freedom and human rights, I do not stop at the dichotomy of universalism and relativism of human rights. However, religious conversion needs to be analyzed as part of the freedom of religion whose subjects must be protected. This paper will analyze the issue of religious conversion in two perspectives: first, how religious conversion (in and out conversion) in religious doctrines and teachings; and, second, how to understand religious conversion in the discourse of freedom of religion which is closely intertwined with human rights. The method used in this paper is a combination of interviews and literature study. The findings in this research show that freedom of religion is often constrained by religion itself (so-called religious relativism)
Downloads
References
Sharma, A. (2011). Problematizing Religious Freedom: Studies in Global Justice (Issue Book, Whole).
Azra, A. (2010). Kebebasan Beragama atau Berkeyakinan: Sekapur Sirih. In Kebebasan Beragama atau Berkeyakinan: Seberapa Jauh? Kanisius.
Baer, M. D. (2014). History and Religious Conversion. In The Oxford Handbook of Religious Conversion. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195338522.013.001
Bautista, J. (2014). Christianity in Southeast Asia Colonialism, Nationalism and the Caveats to Conversion. In The Oxford Handbook of Christianity in Asia (pp. 1–19). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199329069.013.0014
Bielefeldt, H. (2013). Misperceptions of Freedom of Religion or Belief. Human Rights Quarterly, 35(1), 33–68. https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2013.0009
Cragun, R. T., & Hammer, J. H. (2011). “One Person’s Apostate is Another Person’s Convert”: What Terminology Tells Us about Pro-Religious Hegemony in the Sociology of Religion. Humanity & Society, 35, 149–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/016059761103500107
Evans, M. D. (2010). Analisis Historis Terhadap Kebebasan Beragama atau Berkeyakinan sebagai Cara Menyelesaikan Konflik. In Kebebasan Beragama atau Berkeyakinan: Seberapa Jauh? Kanisius.
Fauziyah, S., & Nasionalita, K. (2018). Counter Hegemoni Atas Otoritas Agama Pada Film. Kajian Ilmu Komunikasi, 48.
Hukmi, R. (2021). The Ontological Status of Religion and Its Significance for Religious Freedom. Antinomi Press.
Kimball, C. (2008). When Religion Becomes Evil. HarperCollins e-books. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.40-6361
Li, X. (2006). Ethics, Human Rights and Culture. In Ethics, Human Rights and Culture. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230511583
Lindholm, T. (2010). Justifikasi Filosofis dan Keagamaan Terhadap Kebebasan Beragama atau Berkeyakinan. In Kebebasan Beragama atau Berkeyakinan: Seberapa Jauh? Kanisius.
Maarif, S. (2017). Pasang Surut Rekognisi Agama Leluhur dalam Politik Agama di Indonesia. CRCS (Center for Religious and Cross-cultural Studies).
Quinn, P. L. (1995). Religious Pluralism and Religious Relativism. In Relativism and Religion. Wake Forest University.
Rambo, L. R. (1993). Understanding Religious Conversion. Yale University Press.
Rambo, L. R., & Farhadian, C. E. (1999). Converting: Stages of Religious Change. In Religious Conversion: Contemporary Practices and Controversies. Cassell.
Sharma, A. (2011). Problematizing Religious Freedom: Studies in Global Justice (Issue Book, Whole).
Snow, D. A., & Machalek, R. (1984). The Sociology of Conversion. Anual Review Sociology, 10(May 2022), 167–190.
Titaley, J. A. (2013). Religiousitas di Alinea Tiga: Pluralisme, Nasionalisme, dan Transformasi Agama-Agama. Satya Wacana University Press.
Tylor, D. (1999). Conversion: Inward, Outward, and Awkward. In Religious Conversion: Contemporary Practices and Controversies. Cassell.
Worth, O. (2009). Beyond World Order and Transnasional Classes: The (Re)application of Gramschi in Global Politics. In Gramsci and Global Politics: Hegemony and Resistance. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203878910
Yekrianus, S. (2021). Kebebasan Beragama di Indonesia dalam Terang Pemikiran Barcuh De
Spinoza. Focus. https://setara-institute.org/kebebasan-beragamaberkeyakinan-di-indonesia-2016
Copyright (c) 2023 Vikry Reinaldo Paais
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
