Dynamic Ideology of Traditionality in Developing Holy Places at Hindus Family in Cakranegara Territory Mataram City

  • I Wayan Ardhi Wirawan

Abstract

This study aims to examine the dynamics of traditionality ideology in building holy place among Hindus families in Cakranegara territory, Mataram city. This research was designed in the type of interpretative qualitative research using a case study model. Data collection techniques through observation, interviews, and documentation. Data were analyzed through the stages of classification, reduction, and interpretation. Tri angulation techniques, both tri angulation methods and tri angulation of data sources were used to check the validity of the data. The results showed that the dynamics of traditional ideology in building holy place of Hindu families had been indicated by transformation of cultural traditions at Hinduism practices in four dimensions. First, the position of placing the holy place later no longer applies traditional concepts in a rigid and standard manner. Second, with regard to the spatial size in the construction of holy place in at Hindu families is no longer fixed on the size of the spatial layout that is traditionally applied but adjusted to the situation and condition of karang paumahan (area of home). Third, the form of holy has adapted to the inclusion of external culture. Fourth, the number of pelinggih (holiy place buildings) tends to decrease, especially in the relatively small area of home.

Keywords: dynamics, traditionality ideology, holy place, Hindu families.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anom, I.B. 2009.Tentang Membangun Mrajan. Denpasar: CV.Kayumas Agung

Althusser, Louis. 2004. Tentang Ideologi, Strukturalisme marxis, Psikoanalisis, Cultural studies. Terjemahan Olsy Vinoly Arnof, Yogyakarta dan Bandung: Jalasutra

Bourdieu, Pierre. 1991. Language and Symbolic Power. Edited and Introduced by John B. Thompson, Translated by Gino Raymond and Matthew Adamson, Great Britain: Polity Press

..……… 1990. The Logic of Practice. Translated by Richard Nice, California: Stanford University Press

Dwijendra, N.K.Acwin.2008. Arsitektur Bangunan Suci Hindu Berdasarkan Asta Kosala-Kosali, Denpasar: Udayana University Press

Fashri, Fauzi. 2007. Penyingkapan Kuasa Simbol; Apropriasi Reflektif Pemikiran Pierre Bourdieu. Yogyakarta: Juxtapose

Fontana, A. dan Frey, J.H. 2009. “Wawancara Seni Ilmu Pengetahuan” dalam buku Handbook of Qualitative Research. Editor: Denzin N.K. dan Lincoln Y.S. Terjemahan Dariyatno dkk. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar

Geertz, Clifford. 1992, Tafsir Kebudayaan. Terjemahan Fransisco Budi Hardiman. Yogyakarta: Kanisius

Kartini Kartono. 1990. Pengantar Metodologi Riset Sosial. Bandung: Mandar maju

------. 1990. Pengantar Metodologi Penelitian Sosial. Bandung: Bandar Maju

Koentjaraningrat, 2003, Pengantar Antropologi I, Jakarta: Rineka Cipta

Kumbara, A.A. N. A. 2004. “Etnisitas dan Kebangkitan Kembali Politik Aliran pada Era Reformasi: Perspektif Teoritis”. dalam Buku Politik Kebudayaan dan Identitas Etnik. Editor: I Wayan Ardika dan Dharma Putra. Denpasar: Fak. Sastra Unud dan Balimangsi Press

Mulyadi, Lalu, 2001, “Verifikasi spasial Permukiman Hindu Di Cakranegara territory Lombok Nusa tenggara Barat”, Yogyakarta: Tesis UGM

Nawawi, Handari 1983, Metode Penelitian Bidang Sosial, Yogyakarta: Gajah Mada University Press

Ngurah, I G. M. dkk. 1998. Buku pendidikan Agama Hindu untuk Perguruan Tinggi. Surabaya: Paramita

Nurkancana, I Wayan, 1998, Menguak takbir Perkembangan Hindu, Denpasar: BPPals, D.L.,2001, Dekontruksi Kebenaran Kritik Tujuh Teori Agama, Terjemahan Inyiak Ridwan Muzir, M. Syukri, Yogyakarta: IRCiSoD

Piliang, Yasraf A. 2003. Hipersemiotika: Tafsir Cultural Studies atas Matinya Makna. Yogyakarta & Bandung: Jalasutra

Sanderson, S.K.,2003, Makro Sosiologi, Terjemahan Farid Wajidi, S. Menno, Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada


Soebandi, Ktut. 1985. Berbakti Kepada Kawitan (leluhur) adalah Paramo Dharmah. Denpasar: Kayumas Agung

Suandra, I Made. 1997. Himpunan Ulap-Ulap Palinggih. Denpasar: Upada sastra

Suprayogo Iman dan Tobroni. 2001. Metodologi Penelitian Sosial-Agama. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya

Takwin, Bagus. 2009. Akar-Akar Ideologi: Pengantar Kajian Konsep Ideologi dari Plato Hingga Bourdieu. Yogyakarta: Jalasutra

Tim Penyusun. 2009. Pedoman Membangun Tempat Ibadah. Jakarta:Dirjen Bimas Hindu

Tim Penyusun. 2000. Siwatattwa. Denpasar: Pemprop Bali

Titib, I Made, 2003, Teologi Dan Simbol-Simbol Dalam Agama Hindu, Surabaya: Paramita

Triguna, I.B.Y. 2001. “Redifinisi Simbolisme Masyarakat Hindu Di Bali” Denpasar: Laporan Penelitian Unhi

.............. 2000. Teori Tentang Simbol. Denpasar: Widya Dharma

...............1994. “Pergeseran Dalam Pelaksanaan Agama: Menuju Tattwa” dalam Buku Dinamika masyarakat dan Kebudayaan Bali. Editor: I Gde Pitana. Denpasar : BP

...............2008. “Modal Budaya dalam Perspektif Teoritik dan Terapan”. dalam Buku Kebudayaan dan Modal Budaya Bali dalam teropong Lokal, Nasional, Global. Editor IBG Yudha Triguna. Denpasar: Widya Dharma

………..2009. “Proteksi Pengetahuan dan Teknologi Tradisional Bali”. Kata Pengantar Buku Ngwangun Parhyangan Lan Paumahan. Denpasar Widya Dharma


Widana, I Gusti Ketut, 2001, Hindu Berkiblat Ke India? Dan Pertanyaan lain tentang Hindu, Denpasar: BP

Widana, I.B.G. 2011. Dharmaning Asta Kosala Kosali, Arsitektur Tradisional Bali. Denpasar: Dharma Putra

Wijayananda, Ida Pandita Mpu Jaya. 2004. Tata Letak Tanah dan Bangunan. Surabaya: Paramita

Wikarman, I N.S. 1998. Sanggah Kemulan, Fungsi dan Pengertiannya. Surabaya: Paramita

Wirawan, I Wayan A 2006. “Dinamika dalam Sistem Simbol Kegamaan pada Komunitas Hindu di Kota Mataram, Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Barat (Sebuah Kajian Budaya)”. Denpasar: Tesis Kajian Budaya Unud.

Yin, Robert K. 2004. Studi Kasus, Desain & Metode. Terjemahan Djauzi Mudzakir. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada
Published
2020-06-30
How to Cite
Wirawan, I. W. (2020). Dynamic Ideology of Traditionality in Developing Holy Places at Hindus Family in Cakranegara Territory Mataram City. Satya Widya: Jurnal Studi Agama, 3(1), 27-52. https://doi.org/10.33363/swjsa.v3i1.435