TELAAH KRITIS TERHADAP PRAPERADILAN JAMINAN PERLINDUNGAN HAM SETELAH PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR: 21/PPU-XII/2014 DALAM PERSPEKTIF PERADILAN PIDANA

  • Salundik . STIH Tambun Bungai Palangkaraya
Keywords: Objection Mechanism, Guarantee of Human Rights Protection, and Criminal Justice Perspective

Abstract

The principal thing which is progress in the provisions of Law Number 8 of 1981 concerning the Criminal Procedure Code which has been in effect since December 31, 1981 until now, namely the existence of a pretrial institution is regulated in chapter X articles 77 to article 83, but in this provision there is no mention of authority. The pretrial judge determines whether the determination of a suspect is legal by the investigator, although the minimum parameter of 2 (two) pieces of evidence is the keyword in determining the suspect, but at least 2 (two) pieces of evidence are not independent parameters. Because the acquisition is also influenced by other factors on which it is based. Therefore, the acquisition of these factors also affects the validity of the acquisition of at least 2 (two) pieces of evidence which will have a final impact on the validity of the determination of the suspect by the investigator. In connection with the task of trying judges as the main actors of judicial power in Article 5 paragraph (1) of Law Number 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Power, that judges have obligations including: obliged to explore, follow and understand legal values ​​and a sense of justice that lives in Public. So the judge in pretrial cases has the authority to examine (assess) the performance of the results of the investigation from the investigator, that is, everything that underlies and occurs in the investigation will also have an influence on the determination of the suspect, as the main orientation of the investigation. Therefore, everything that underlies and occurs in the investigation process that has an impact on the determination of the suspect is taken into account in determining the validity of the determination of the suspect based on the nature of pretrial, namely as a form of supervision and objection mechanism to the law enforcement process which is closely related to the guarantee of the protection of human rights in From the perspective of criminal justice, the renewal of the Criminal Procedure Code must explicitly include the authority of pretrial judges in determining whether the status of a suspect is legal by investigators.

References

Amirudin dan Zainal Asikin, Pengentar Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta:PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, 2004.

Andi Hamzah dan RM Surachman, Pre-Trial Justice Dan Diseretionary Justice Dalam KUHAP Berbagai Negara, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2014

Andi Hamzah, Pengantar Hukum Pidana Indonesia, Jakarta: CV. Sabta Arta Jaya

Burhan Ashofa, Metode Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta:PT. Rineka Cipta, 1998

Edy O.S Hiariej, Teori Hukum Pembuktian, Jakarta: Erlangga, 2012

H.M Mansur Effendi, Hak Asasi Manusia Dalam Hukum Nasional, Cet I, Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia, 1994.

Muladi, Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia, Jakarta: Gaya Media Pratama, 1996.

Peraturan Perundang-Undangan
Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945;
Het Herziene Inlandsch Reglement (Staatsblad 1848 Nomor 16 Jo Staatsblad Tahun 1926 Nomor 559, Jo Staatsblad 1915 Nomor 732);

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (Staatsblad Tahun 1915-Nomor 732);
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 8 Tahun 1981tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana;

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 30 Tahun 2002 Tentang Komisi Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi;

Undang-undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 tentang Narkotika;
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 Tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman.

Dokumen Hukum
Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 4 Tahun 2016 Tentang Larangan Peninjauan Kembali Putusan Praperadilan

Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi nomor 21/PUU-XII/2014
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi nomor 42/PUU-XV/2017
Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Selatan Nomor 04/Pid.Prap/2015/PN Jkt. Sel.

Laporan Andi Moctar Ketua Komisi Gabungan III Dan I Dpr-Ri Tentang Jalannya Pembahasan Dalam Pembicaraan Tingkat III Atas Ruu Hukum Acara Pidana, 2007, “Proses Pembahasan Ruu Tentang Hukum Acara Pidana Tahun 1979” Bidang Arsip Dan Dokumentasi Pusat Pengkajian Pengolahan Data Dan Informasi Secretariat Jendral DPR-RI, Jakarta
Published
2022-12-01
How to Cite
., S. (2022). TELAAH KRITIS TERHADAP PRAPERADILAN JAMINAN PERLINDUNGAN HAM SETELAH PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR: 21/PPU-XII/2014 DALAM PERSPEKTIF PERADILAN PIDANA. Belom Bahadat, 12(2), 92-112. Retrieved from https://ejournal.iahntp.ac.id/index.php/belom-bahadat/article/view/896