Studi Deskriptif Terkait Pemahaman Mahasiswa Hukum Terhadap Tindakan Plagiarisme
Abstract
This study aims to describe the understanding of law students regarding plagiarism behavior. The form of this research is descriptive quantitative research. Data was collected through an online questionnaire distributed to 45 students of the Dharma Sastra Faculty using a google form. From the results of the data analysis, it is known that students' understanding can be said to be good with the respondents answering the questionnaire as a whole. Based on the data from the survey that has been conducted, it was found that all aspects studied were in the range of values from 3.40 to 4.20. It can be interpreted that students have a good understanding of plagiarism. In this study, there were four (4) categories that were examined to get conclusions about students' understanding of plagiarism. For the category of student understanding of plagiarism behavior is at a score of 3.9. This value can be interpreted that students can determine the behavior that is said to be plagiarism. For the second category, namely the ability of students to classify plagiarism behavior, the score is 3.51. This means that students have a good understanding in classifying plagiarism behavior. The third category, good and correct quoting methods, got a score of 3.96, namely students have good knowledge of how to cite properly and correctly. For the last category, namely the category of understanding about violations of plagiarism, the data shows a value of 3.76 which means that students of the Faculty of Dharma Sastra have a good understanding of violations of plagiarism behavior. However, there are still acts of plagiarism that are carried out intentionally or unintentionally by students in completing coursework, so we give an appeal to all elements of leadership, especially in the Dharma Sastra Faculty, so that they can set limits on writing ethics, editing and others. In addition, it is necessary to socialize writing ethics so that students get qualified information and knowledge in writing scientific articles/papers.
References
to Research in Education.
Bondang, T. (2015). Buku Panduan Tugas Akhir Teknik Informatika STITEK Bontang. Yogyakarta: Deepublish.
Bakry, U. (2016). Pedoman Penulisan Skripsi Hubungan Internasional. Yogyakarta:
Bakhtiyari, K., Salehi, H., Embi, M. A.,Shakiba, M., Zavvari, A., ShahbaziMoghadam, M., Mohammadjafari, M. (2014). Ethical and unethical methods of plagiarism prevention in academic writing. International Education Studies, 7(7), 52–62.https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v7n7p52
Betts, L. R., Bostock, S. J., Elder, T. J., & Trueman, M. (2011). Encouraging
Good Writing Practice in First-Year Psychology Students: An Intervention Using Turnitin.
Psychology Teaching Review, 18(2), 74–81.
Bretag, T., & Mahmud, S. (2009). A Model for Determining Student Plagiarism: Electronic Detection and Academic Judgement. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 6(1), 49–60.
Halupa, C. M. (2014). Exploring student self-plagiarism. International Journal of Higher Education, 3(1), 121–126. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v3n1p12 1
Hidayati, R. dkk. (2009). PERILAKU PLAGIAT MAHASISWA (Studi Kasus Plagiasi Melalui Internet Dikalangan Mahasiswa Fisipol UNIB). UNIB Scholarn Repository.
Hussin, H., & Ismail, M. (2013).Plagiarism: More than Meets the Eye. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 4(2), 148–151. https://doi.org/10.7575 /aiac.alls.v.4n .2p.148
Jackson, P. a. (2006). Plagiarism Instruction Online: Assessing Undergraduate Students’ Ability to Avoid Plagiarism. College Research Libraries, 67, 418–428. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.67.5.418
Emzir. (2007), Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan, Jakarta: Rajawali pers.
J. Parson, Patrecia. (2006), Etika Publik Realitions Panduan Praktik Terbaik.
Kbbi, K. B. B. I. (2016). Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia (KBBI). Plagiat.
Komara, Endang. (2009). Metode Penulisan Karya Ilmiah, Bandung: Majalah Ilmiah Kopertis Wilayah IV Wawasan Tri Darma
London: Glora Aksara Pratama
Laurens, Marcella Joyce. (2005), Arsitektur dan Perilaku Manusia, Surabaya: Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia
Maolani, Rukaesih.A & Ucu Cahaya. (2015), Metode Penelitian Pendidikan,Jakarta, Raja Garfindo Persada
Nimasari, E. P., & Gestanti, R. A. (2017). Persepsi Mahasiswa Terhadap Plagiat.
Suryana, E. (2016). Self efficacy dan Plagiarisme di perguruan tinggi. Tadrib, 2(2), 214-237.
Sugiono, 2016, Metode Penelitian Pendidikan, Bandung, Alfabeta.
Surakhmad, Winarno. (2015). Panduan Praktis Penulisan Karya Ilmiah, Jakarta: Kompas Media Nusantara
Suryani. & Hendryadi. (2015). Metode Riset Kuantitatif Teori dan Aplikasi Pada Penelitian Bidang Manajemen Ekonomi Islam, Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Grup
Suryani. & Hendryadi. (2015). Metode Riset Kuantitatif Teori dan Aplikasi Pada Penelitian Bidang Manajemen Ekonomi Islam, Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Grup
Und¬ang-Undang R.I Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 Tentang SISDIKNAS & Peraturan
Pemerintah R.I Tahun 2013 Tentang Standar Nasional Pendidikan Serta Wajib Belajar
Sarumpet, et al., (2011). Teori Sosiologi Modern. Kencana. Jakarta.Deepublish
Suryani. & Hendryadi. (2015). Metode Riset Kuantitatif Teori dan Aplikasi Pada Penelitian Bidang Manajemen Ekonomi Islam, Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Grup
Sudigdo, S. (2007). Beberapa Catatan tentang Plagiarisme. Majalah Kedokteran Indonesia, Volume: 57, Nomor:8, Agustus 2007, 239-244.
Rizal, F. (2016). PERSEPSI MAHASISWA PROGRAM STUDI PENDIDIKAN TEKNIK BANGUNAN JURUSAN TEKNIK SIPIL FAKULTAS TEKNIK UNIVERSITAS NEGERI PADANG TERHADAP PLAGIAT. CIVED (Journal of Civil Engineering and Vocational Education), 4(2).
Vindy. (2016). Internet Plagiarism di Kalangan Mahasiswa ( Studi Fenomenologi tentang motif internet plagiarism di kalangan mahasiswa ilmu informasi dan perpustakaan, Universitas Airlangga)
Wawan, A. & M, Dewi. (2017). Pengetahuan, Sikap, dan Perilaku Manusia, Yogyakarta: Nuha Medika
Wfy, Y. (2010). Perilaku Plagiat di Kalangan Eksak dan Non-Eksak (Studi Deskriptif Persepsi Maha siswa dan Staf Pengajar FST dan FISIP terhadap Perilaku Plagiat di Unair).
.png)
