LEGALITY OF THERAPEUTIC CONTRACTS IN HANDLING HEALTH FROM THE LEGAL PERSPECTIVE OF AGREEMENTS AND HINDU LAW
Abstract
Health is a very important factor and has become a basic necessity for human life. When humans are sick and have to get certain medical actions we have to sign a contract which is called a Therapeutic contract. The purpose of this study was to determine the legality of the therapeutic contract in the perspective of Hindu law and contract law. The approach method in this research uses normative legal research methods. The legality of a therapeutic contract, both from the perspective of treaty law and Hindu law, refers to the arrangements regarding the validity of the agreement and the conditions for binding the contract or pacta sunt servanda. In the agreement law, the provisions for the validity of the agreement are contained in the provisions of Article 1320 of the Civil Code and regarding the conditions for binding contracts are regulated in Article 1338 of the Civil Code. Whereas in Hindu law, the arrangements regarding the validity of the agreement and the conditions for binding the contract are regulated in Book VIII Manawa Dharmasastra, namely for the legal terms of the agreement in Book VIII Sloka 165 (agreement), Sloka 163 (skill), Sloka 143 (achievement), and Sloka 164 (causa kosher); The conditions for binding contracts (pacta sunt servanda) are stipulated in Book VIII Sloka 46. As well as being sourced from the Civil Code and Manawa Dharmasastra, therapeutic contracts whose object is inspanning verbintenis (medical action based on effort, not results achieved) are also subject to the provisions of national law as stated in the Minister of Health Regulation Number 290 of 2008 concerning Approval of Medical Action.
References
Felenditi, Dionisius. 2009. Penegakan Otonomi Pasien Melalui Persetujuan Tindakan Medis (Informed Consent). Jurnal Biomedik, Volume 1, Nomor 1, Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Sam Ratulangi: Manado
Hariyani, Safitri. 2005.Sengketa Medik (Alternafif Penyelesaian Sengketa Antara Dokter Dan Pasien) Jakaarta :Diadit Medika
Hendrojono. 2007. Batas Pertanggungan Hukum Malpraktik Dokter dalam Transaksi Terapeutik.Surabaya: Srikandi
https://bayuwangidharma.blogspot.com, akses tanggal 22 Agustus 2020
Komalawati, Veronica. 1999. Peranan Informed Consent Dalam Transaksi Terapeutik. PT Citra Aditya Bakti: Bandung.
Shidarta. 2006. Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen Indonesia. Edisi Revisi. PT Grasindo: Jakarta
Suda, I Ketut. 2013. Pergulatan Pemikiran Cendekiawan Hindu: Perspektif Fungsional Struktural (Sebuah Bunga Rampai). Widya Dharma (Unhi) Press: Denpasar.
Syahrani, Riduan 2006. Seluk Beluk Dan Asas-Asas Hukum Perdata, PT.Alumni, Bandung,
Soerjono, Soekanto dan Sri Mamudji. 2009. Penelitian Hukum Normatif Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Cetakan 11. PT Raja Grafindo Persada: Jakarta.
Tutik, Titik Triwulan. 2010. Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pasien. Prestasi Pustaka Publisher: Jakarta.
Timoera, Dwi Afrimeti. Jurnal Ilmiah Mimbar Demokrasi, Volume 10 Nomor 2, April 2011
Indonesia. 1945. Undang Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.
Indonesia. 2009. Undang-Undang Nomor 36 Tahun 2009 Tentang Kesehatan.
Indonesia. 2008. Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Nomor 290/MENKES/PER/III/2008 tentang Persetujuan Tindakan Kedokteran.
Tjitrosudibio. 2008. Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata. Jakarta: PT Pradnya Paramita.